Sunday, September 21, 2008

Meet the Candidate

A Canadian Press article had a link that led me to the writings of R.K. Finch, Liberal candidate for Dufferin-Caledon. Over the years I've read some shrill, over-the-top assessments of Stephen Harper. There are comparisons to Bush, allusions to some malevolent right-wing cabal, accusations of snobbery and critiques of his parenting style. Never have I come across a one-stop hate-fest like this. Keep in mind, this piece was written in March of this year -- long after most Canadians began to shed the 'fear' of a 'hidden agenda' and see Harper in a more positive light.
Originally it was based on the same basic intuition all Canadians feel when staring at those glassy, watery eyes; eyes that only show a glint of real emotion when they're blazing in delight over the taunting or jeering or destruction of someone else, or accidentally revealing an astoundingly low self-esteem and less surprisingly high sense of paranoia. It was in reaction to the early indications that his right-wing, ultra-conservative agenda is not good for all Canadians yet is slowly but surely going to be forced upon us anyway if he has anything to do with it, which unfortunately at this moment in history, he does. It was due also to the sense of that hidden agenda that almost all Canadians know with every ounce of intuition is there, though they just can't put their finger on it.
This is how it begins. Never mind that much of her opinion is based on his looks and her 'intuition' -- it's also based on innuendo and allusions to gossip that circulated ages ago. Apparently Rebecca Finch has had her head in the sand for the past couple of years -- but that was just the warm up:

Let's start with the really nasty stuff, though, the stuff that conjures up comparisons to Hitler or Stalin; let's talk about a damaged psychology, a malevolent personality disorder, and lessons that we, the discerning public who are ultimately affected by these characters, should have already learned.

When I recently re-read the definition of the term, "malignant narcissism", I felt like I was sitting in the gallery of the House of Commons, watching Harper . . .
Harper mightn't be your cup of tea, but Stalin-like? A bit much.
A megalomaniac? Malignant narcissist? Wonder if it's a pot/kettle thing.
And taking "
delight over the taunting or jeering or destruction of someone else." Maybe poor Becky's projecting a little. And she's not finished:
What we have here is an immature and conscienceless man who is using this country as an experiment to prove a theory posited in a university paper (which got him great attention) he can't get over, and for the ongoing attention he discovered after writing that paper which led to meeting the people who secured his success in politics, allowing him to simultaneously indulge his megalomania while holding fast to his grudges and punishing those who treated him badly in his erased history. This is a story about a radical Christian who denies his beliefs in order to win over what he shows with disdain is the moderate majority, who has bought into a story of a political parousia that includes Canada as the landing strip for Jesus' triumphant return to Earth.
This woman has put a lot of time and energy into hating Stephen Harper, yet most of what she says is completely unsubstantiated. It just flows from a visceral, blinding hatred that seems to seep into the very fibre of her being. Look at those adjectives -- so certain and so hostile -- immature, conscienceless. Look at the tone, mocking and sneering. It's creepy and weird how very much she hates a complete stranger, based solely on the biographies she's read, some snippets on CPAC and some pseudo-pychological conjecture about his motivations. This obnoxious, toxic screed says a lot about its author. If she manages to win her riding, let's hope she tones down her rhetoric and learns to judge people based on more substantial criteria than their eye colour, or the province they choose to live in, or their religious beliefs -- no matter how ugly or ridiculous she finds them.

For those who are interested, here is a post I wrote a while back responding to someone who shared a similar distaste for Stephen Harper. Defending Stephen Harper from January, 2006.

canadianna

9 comments:

Joanne (True Blue) said...

Well, she should fit in quite nicely with all the mud-slinging in Parliament.

Anonymous said...

You should expect CTV to call soon for an interview for exposing the writings of this candidate......oh,right - she's a liberal.

Anonymous said...

I'll say this for Ms. Finch she certainly captured the way I feel about all Liberals, except she didn't quite capture the absolute repugnance I feel every time one of them opens his/her mouth.
I'll bet she has a real hissy-fit when she finds out she is stuck with Mr. Harper leading the country for at least the next four years.
By the way, whatever happened to this kinder, gentler type of politics we were supposed to see as more women got elected?

Raging Ranter said...

Originally it was based on the same basic intuition all Canadians feel when staring at those glassy, watery eyes; eyes that only show a glint of real emotion when they're blazing in delight over the taunting or jeering or destruction of someone else, or accidentally revealing an astoundingly low self-esteem...

When a progressive accuses someone of "low self-esteem", you know you can pretty much ignore whatever inane babbling that follows. Progressives consider the term "low self-esteem" to be a deeply insulting pejorative; one of the most severe criticisms you can level at a fellow human being.

If a progressive says that so-and-so lacks self-esteem, they are basically dismissing that person as a member of the human race. Social scientists have been preaching to us for the past three decades that low self-esteem is the root of all evil. Conversely, someone with low self-esteem must be, by default, inherently evil.

You can see exactly that progressive "reasoning" (an oxymoron if there ever was one) at work in this woman's paranoid ramblings. And you can be sure her fellow progressives, with similar "intuitions" about Stephen Harper, swallow every word of this pap. That's it! Why yes of course!! That's what I couldn't quite put my finger on - his low self-esteem!! It all makes sense now.... he's evil because he has no self-esteem. That's what I detected all along!!! (Because I'm so smart and intuitive and I have high self-esteem.) Goodness, this monster must be stopped from getting a majority!

le politico said...

let's talk about a damaged psychology, a malevolent personality disorder

Indeed..

Anonymous said...

Aaaaand, another ranting blog where no one read the content or knows what they're talking about. She was interviewed by CTV, you'd have noticed as it looped the whole earlier part of this week. She stood by her writing on her magazine. She invited people to read it in context. You have taken an out of context quote and chosen to smear someone with it. Your insane partisan hatred is quite a spectre to behold. Imagine your reaction if you found yourself in Finch's shoes because of the language and insinuations all of you use screaming on these blogs. At least hers are researched articles.

Canadianna said...

Anonymous -- All of the quotes I took from her article are IN context. I didn't take sentences; I took entire paragraphs so the meaning would not be lost.
If she 'stands by her writing' and her writing out and out says that Stephen Harper is conscienceless, immature, a megalomaniacal personality and malignantly narcissistic --(and I didn't even put in the parts where she implies he's almost inhuman the way he smiles etc.)
She puts those thoughts into black and white and you say that somehow I'm reading it wrong?
What meaning did you draw from her words? What meaning is there except that Rebecca Finch really, really, really hates Stephen Harper --- so much so that she went weird on her ezine to prove it.
I've read some of her other stuff too. Most of it seems innocuous.

The rant though, isn't on my blog -- it's on metaball,ca and it's written by Rebecca Finch.

If you're going to stick up for someone, at least try a little harder than this.

Your insane partisan hatred is quite a spectre to behold.

I don't hate Rebecca Finch -- talk about reading things wrong. I don't even imply that I might hate her let alone state it. I don't know the woman. I just know what she wrote was way, way, way over the top coming from someone who wants to hold political office.

Imagine your reaction if you found yourself in Finch's shoes because of the language and insinuations all of you use screaming on these blogs.

Ms Finch is a big girl, playing in the big leagues now. If she can't take the heat, she should try another job. When you write for a living and put yourself forward as a political candidate, you are inviting scrutiny. If you don't measure up, you've got to learn to deal.

At least hers are researched articles.
No. She's read a couple of books and she's drawn a lot on her personal emotions, not her intellect.

But enough. The only one insanely partisan here is you, and I'm bored with you already.

Anonymous said...

I don't "hate "Rebecca Finch" nor do I "hate"Stephan Harper.
But reading Ms Finch's diatribe makes me ill.... and as a citizen of the county she is trying to represent..... it has and will leave a sour taste in the mouths of many.
Many of my family fought against Hitler in WWII and Ms Finch is nothing but an armchair quarterback.
Please do not speak of tyranny when you know absolutely nothing of the issue. Our residents don't need your rants... we need answers to solve our community problems.

Please grow up Ms Finch and take your rantings elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

She must have attended Heather Mallick's journo classes at U of T.
...and passed with flying colours, unchallenged, so to speak.

bluetech