Monday, May 07, 2007

Not racism, lack of imagination

I remember the Air India bombing. Never once did I consider it anything but a tragedy and never once did I consider it unimportant or just an 'Indian affair.'

Bob Rae and Ujjal Dosanjh say those are the attitudes of Canadians about the tragedy. They are implying that those kinds of attitudes -- racism and indifference -- allowed the tragedy to happen in the first place and have allowed the investigation to drag on this long.

I refuse to believe that civil servants were so racist that they could ignore a security threat because of the race of the passengers. I also don't believe that Canadians were indifferent to the mass-murder of hundreds of people who embarked from our soil, regardless of whether they were Indian, Canadian or both. That's insulting to all of us who have followed this case over the years and who have hoped for justice. The plodding pace of the government and its various investigations into this case is not testimony to the investment of ordinary Canadians in this tragedy. Our government represented its own interests, not our concerns.

Rae and Dosanjh are implying that Canadians would have cared more if this had been a British Airways or United jet. I don't think that's true.

And if our civil servants got it wrong before the fact, and didn't adequately assess the risk, it wasn't racism. It was ignorance. In those days it was almost unthinkable that radicals of any ilk would actually blow innocent people out of the sky. No political goal has ever been that important to most Canadians that they would bomb a plane or understand the psyche of someone who would. If there is any fault with the system of the time it was the Canadian habit of projecting our own world view onto others. We always assume that in any given situation, people will behave the way we would -- we could not imagine the malice that would allow someone to be so cruel. The complacency of the government on this was, at least in part, due to a tragic inability to view the world through the eyes of those who use terror to advance their goals.

Nearly thirty years on, in the post 9/11 world, no act of evil seems impossible. We are attempting to judge the 1980's Canadian security agencies based on our understanding of terror today. Their lack of imagination was understandable given their experience.

Imagine if Canadians had been indifferent? Twenty-seven years is far too long, but if the general public really viewed this is an 'Indian affair' or had we been indifferent to the deaths of hundreds of people because of their race, there would have been no demands for an inquiry beyond the families. Without public support, no amount of pushing from them would have forced politicians to review this tragedy.

Not every act of ignorance is grounded in racism. In 1985, we had rarely had to look at the world through the eyes of terrorists. What would seem like incompetence now,
might have been the simple inability to put ourselves in the other guy's shoes and to see that he really had no qualms about blowing up innocent people.

canadianna

17 comments:

Matt said...

Very well said. Thanks for writing this, someone had to say it

Anonymous said...

I thought we had laws for hate-crimes which can be statements made in public that incite a hatred or negative bias against an identifiable group by Race,Religion,Political views, nationality or Origin.
Dosanj would be the first one screaming Racist if the RCMP did arrest Sikh's based on "Allegations" or rumours.
So it pretty rich for him to now admit he had a bias against the RCMP as White People that didn't care and yet that exact bigotry Dosanj holds is why Police fear arresting Sikhs,Muslims,Blacks,or suspected terrorist like the case in June 2006 where the Lawyer for some of the 17 Jihadist is claiming the RCMP is Racists and Islamophobic and used Profiling and bogus explosives to label these kids as Terrorists.

Joanne (True Blue) said...

Good smack-down, Canadianna!

Bob Rae can speak for himself if he wants, but it is typical Liberal arrogance for him to be assuming the reaction of all Canadians when this tragedy occurred.

Anonymous said...

I, too, recall the Air India disaster; it took many months to determine that the plane was brought down by a bomb because the wreckage settled in water that was about 12,000 feet deep. It was finally an Indian court that made the determination.

It was also reported at the time that a warning had been received, along with warnings for lots of other flights as well.

NDPers Bob and Ujjal can screech racism all the like but the fact is that Canada was woefully unprepared for a terrorist act of that sort, especially given that whatever forensic evidence there was could not be recovered. One hopes that police investigative techniques and the intelligence service has become more effective over the past twenty years but it should be noted that if they have it has been despite Bob and Ujjal's best efforts, not because of them.

Anonymous said...

How old were you in 1985?

I remember Air India very well, and the media certainly did not seem to think it was a Canadian tragedy.

I think the racism accusation is hitting a nerve, since all the usual suspects are getting exercised about it.

Canadianna said...

Maybe back in 1985 you were a racist. Don't project your myopia onto the rest of us.

Ti-Guy said...

Look up the word "myopia."

Canadianna said...

ti-guy - idiot. Short sighted, narrow world viewed, unenlightened moron. Now -- look up the words 'get lost'.

Canadianna said...

Sorry ti-guy. You caught me in a bad mood, but I don't need a dictionary.

Anonymous said...

Good post. You have bad moods? Doesn't that make you human?!.

I wanted to comment on the language that we still use to refer to the awful event. Media still call it a disaster (...you use tragedy, and mass-murder. Good for you).

I can't help to think that the use of the word "disaster" somehow implies a displacement of blame, or even an erasing of blame.

Tsunamis and ice storms are typically disasters, the natural kind. I am aware that there are man-made disasters (Bob Rae's government immediately comes to mind) but we normally use the word without qualifications for the natural kind.

Using the term "disaster" in relation to Air India still half-hides the fact that it was a terrorist attack, and that the attackers are terrorists --though we are more cognizant of these things now than we were before as you pointed out. What is more, it hid the fact that the terrorists are in Canada. Today, it hides the fact that we have not much about it.

The Air India bombings were deliberate acts: they resulted in a massacre of innocent people, it was whole-sale murder.

There was racism in the whole affair, of course. The Sikh killers are replete with hatred for Indians and the Hindi. But Dosanjh doesn't want to talk about it.

Canadianna said...

That's so true Kaqchikel. Even if they said 'bombing' rather than 'disaster' it would assign more blame.
I think old language habits die hard. When this first happened and no one was sure why, the word 'disaster' was an apt descriptor, but once the reason was discerned, the media should have been consistently clear that this was not some plane malfunction or pilot error as 'disaster' could imply.

And yes, sniping makes me human -- but I hate getting snitty unless someone really deserves it.

Kristin Beaumont-Politics and Other Things said...

Ujjal talking cover up now...pointing at mulroney et al and ignoring very well the complete lack of interest his liberal party had for any of this...felt it had all been uncovered...what else was there to talk about....he has lost any credibility he used to have with me...
nice post canadianna!!

Patrick Ross said...

There is one thing that we, as Canadians, have to hand to the Americans: when they had their major terrorist attack that revealled the weaknesses of their intelligence and security organizations, they jumped on that right away, and fixed the problems (some people would argue maybe fixed them a little too much, but I digress). Here in Canada, we're going on 20 years+ and even dismantling some of the tools we already have.

Canadianna said...

patrick -- true. I think we're still in some sort of denial mode.

Candace said...

You make some excellent points, C. I recall the bombing as well, but wasn't paying much attention to politics/news at the time. I DO recall it taking a while for me to figure out that the plane was full of Canadians going to India for a visit vs Indians returning from Canada (similar to Mulroney making a condolence call to the Indian PM).

Canadianna said...

Candace -- yes, some of that took a while. I suppose looking back it was a cumulative thing as we learned more. But I don't think anyone had the attitude that Dosanjh says: "it's just a bunch of brown people." It makes you wonder why, if he thinks Canada was/is such a racist country, why would he want to bring his family here and raise them here? He seems to think we (whites) are so terrible that we would just slough off this horrible thing because the people weren't weren't white he was saying yesterday. He must really hate us.

franx said...

I don't understand many people in the world always conflict with rasism and finally to be war..terible..Nice job buddy..keep it uo
http://secretofmind.blogspot.com